.

Toney win over Rahman changed to no decision

The California State Athletic Commission changed its original decision on the James Toney-Hasim Rahman fight from a technical knockout to a no decision.

Toney stopped Rahman in the third round of their July 16 rematch of former heavyweight champions in Temecula, Calif., after Rahman told the ringside doctor that he couldn’t continue because of a cut over his left eye.

The original decision was a technical knockout win for Toney. Rahman later appealed, and after a review, the commission said Monday it was changing the technical knockout to a no decision, according to Bill Douglas of the state athletic commission.


Kournikova avoids Gimelstob following insult

Anna Kournikova doesn’t care about Justin Gimelstob or what he thinks about her.

Last month, Gimelstob insulted the 28-year-old tennis diva on a radio show, but fans who were hoping to see the two face off on court were likely to be disappointed.

Kournikova was in Washington on Wednesday night with World Team Tennis’ St. Louis Aces, who were playing the Washington Kastles, featuring the 31-year-old Gimelstob. The two were not scheduled to play each other in mixed doubles.

In the radio appearance, Gimelstob used a derogatory term to describe Kournikova and made suggestive comments about another player, Nicole Vaidisova.

Kournikova declined to engage in a verbal volley.

“I really don’t want to discuss the matter,” Kournikova said. “I don’t want to give it any more attention or meaning that it already has received. I’m just treating this like any other match.”

Television commercials featuring Gimelstob promoting the U.S. Open Series were scrapped by the U.S. Tennis Association following his remarks and he was suspended for one match without pay by World Team Tennis, but stayed on the air during Wimbledon for his job with the Tennis Channel.

Gimelstob, who retired last year from the tour and sits on the board of the ATP, made no effort to reach out to Kournikova during pre-match festivities. When Kournikova was questioned about Gimelstob, she tried to deflect attention from him.

“I actually forgot about it until you just mentioned it,” Kournikova said. “It’s really no big deal to me.”


The Role of FIFA For the World Cup 2010 Qualifiers

The main role of FIFA in the World Cup 2010 Qualifiers is to implement the process of qualification. They will be the one who will officially work on choosing who will make it for the FIFA World Cup Finals. The FIFA World Cup Finals is considered to be a very famous event known all over the world. The qualification is being used to lessen the huge number of the aspiring participants ranging from about 200 teams and reducing them to only 32 teams.

The World Cup 2010 Qualifiers will be assessed through the qualifying tournaments to know who will be the aspiring teams that will make it to the FIFA World Cup Finals. These tournaments are scheduled to be held inside the six FIFA continental zones like Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America plus the Caribbean. The tournaments are organized through their specific confederations. In each tournament, FIFA will outright decide how many spots will be awarded for each continental zone of course based on the respectable strength of each confederation teams.

Before every hosts of the World Cup will automatically occupy a permanent spot in the finals. World Cup previous results and continental championships are not recognized or put into account due to this, unlike the other sports that are known in the world. It was until 2002 that an automatic spot was given to defending champions. In 2006 World Cup defending championship need to enter the qualifying games too.

In 1934 and 1978 there are only 16 teams for the qualifying round, and since over the years there is an increasing number of teams qualifying for the finals, it increased to 24 teams between 1982 and 1994 and finally making it to 32 teams from 1998 and such qualifying requirement scheme has been the official format throughout the whole history of World Cup.


The Dream Final? An Early Federer Vs Nadal Preview

It is the final that everyone expected from the outset. With due respect to the men who stand in the way of this showdown - Marat Safin, Arnaud Clement and Rainer Schuettler - we will surely be watching part three of what will be a long-running Federer - Nadal Wimbledon saga.

Both players have been in scintillating form so far. They have made light of tricky draws, cruising past dangerous players such as Lleyton Hewitt, Mario Ancic, Ernests Gulbis, Nicolas Kiefer, Mikhail Youzhny and Andy Murray with ease. Their contrasting styles - Federer’s feline grace and Nadal’s brute power - have been showcased, yet neither has been forced to play their best tennis.

Both were in top form in last year’s final. A five set, 3 hour 45 minute epic, it was one of the great Wimbledon matches. Nadal pushed the champion to the limit, missing two chances to break in the decisive fifth set. The contest ebbed and flowed and it easy to expect something similar this year.

There is certainly every reason to think that it will again be close. The Spaniard has again improved his grass court game, with his serve now a major weapon, whilst the champion has answered critics who suggest he is past his best. The bout of glandular fever and high-profile defeats that blighted his early season are long forgotten; Federer loves the grass of Wimbledon and it will need a special performance for him to be beaten.

Nadal is capable of producing such a performance. His straight sets hammering of the Swiss master in the French open final proved his high octane game to be in good order and prompted some to suggest he holds a psychological advantage going into a Wimbledon showdown.

This ignores Federer’s grass court supremacy between the two. Analysing head-to-head records is therefore open to interpretation and we will never know how much the players think about previous meetings.

However, memories from previous clashes would seem to lift Nadal rather than Federer. Since last year’s final they have met four times, with Nadal winning three times and Federer once. All of the Mallorcan’s wins were on clay, including the Roland Garros trouncing.

The pair’s overall record reads 11 wins for Nadal and six for Federer. Nine of Nadal’s wins were on clay, so Federer has won five of their seven meetings on hard and grass courts. Followers of both players will therefore find solace in their previous meetings.

It says everything about the quality of these two players that whatever the outcome on Sunday, it will not be a surprise. Federer said of his title last year that he was ‘happy with every one I get before he takes them all!’ Words said in jest, but the message is clear - Federer knows that any future Wimbledon titles will be well-earned.


Calendar
July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
You are currently browsing the All Day Sport weblog archives for July, 2008.
Categories
Search
Archives